Keywords
Cedro-rosa
Forest seeds vigor
Forest seedlings quality
Brazilian native species
How to Cite
Abstract
Seeds vigor defined in the laboratory does not always reflect the final quality of seedlings produced under nursery conditions or even their survival in plantations. So, we studied the influence of Cedrela fissilis seed storage conditions on its emergence and the morphological quality of produced seedlings. Seeds were collected in October/2011, benefited, conditioned in closed glasses, and stored in three environments for a period of 515 days. Treatments consisted of: I - seedlings produced from seeds without storage (control); II - seedlings produced from seeds stored in a dry chamber; III - seedlings produced from seeds stored in a humid chamber; IV - Seedlings produced from seeds stored in an uncontrolled environment (laboratory). Sowing was performed in 50 cm³ plastic tubes filled with decomposed pinus bark and coconut fiber (50/50 v/v) and packed in a glasshouse. The study analyzed the percentage of seedlings emergence, mean seedlings emergence time, stem diameter, total height, the ratio between total height and stem diameter, shoot length, root length, total, root and shoot dry biomass, and Dickson quality index. Seed storage proved to be a negative factor for the emergence and vigor of C. fissilis seedlings, regardless of the storage environment. In addition, seeds vigor is a preponderant factor to increase seedlings' morphological quality, such as stem diameter and height.
References
Wielewicki AP, Leonhardt C, Schlindwein G, Medeiros ACS. Proposta de padrões de germinação e teor de água para sementes de algumas espécies florestais presentes na região sul do Brasil. Rev Bras Sementes 2006; 28(3): 191-197. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31222006000300027
Ribeiro-Oliveira JP, Ranal MA. Sementes florestais brasileiras: início precário, presente inebriante e o futuro, promissor? Ci Fl 2014; 24(3): 771-784. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-509820142403024
Valadão MBX, Marimon-Junior BH, Morandi PS, Reis SM, Oliveira B, Oliveira EA et al. Initial development and biomass partitioning of Physocalymma scaberrimum Pohl (Lythraceae) under different shading levels. Sci For 2014; 42(101): 129-39.
Vijay K, Lokesh GY, Basave G, Patil SB, Ganiger BS, Rakesh CM. Accelerated ageing test to study the relative storage potential of hybrid sunflower-RSFH-130 (Helianthus annuus). Afr J Agric Res 2015; 10(35): 3502-3506. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2015.9822
Silva DG, Carvalho MLM, Nery MC, Oliveira LM, Caldeira CM. Alterações fisiológicas e bioquímicas durante o armazenamento de sementes de Tabebuia serratifolia. Cerne 2011; 17(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-77602011000100001
Carvalho PER. Circular Técnica 113: Cedro (Cedrela fissilis). Embrapa Florestas: Colombo 2005.
Barstow M. Cedrela fissilis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018: e.T33928A68080477. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/
IUCN.UK.2018-1.RLTS.T33928A68080477.en
Figueiredo FAMM, Carneiro JGA, Penchel RM, Barroso DG, Daher RF. Efeito das variações biométricas de mudas clonais de eucalipto sobre o crescimento no campo. Rev Árvore 2011; 35(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622011000100001
Pezzutti RV, Caldato SL. Sobrevivência e crescimento inicial de mudas de Pinus taeda L. com diferentes diâmetros do colo. Ci Fl 2011; 21(2): 355-362. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050983240
Azevedo IMG, Alencar RM, Barbosa AP, Almeida NO. Estudo do crescimento e qualidade de mudas de marupá (Simarouba amara Aubl.) em viveiro. Acta Amazon 2010; 40(1): 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0044-59672010000100020
Kratz D, Wendling I, Stuepp CA, Fragoso RO. Ranking of substrates based on the morphological parameters of the Piptadenia gonoacantha. Bosque 2016, 37(2): 285-293. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002016000200005
Stuepp CA, Wendling I, Koehler HS, Zuffellato-Ribas KC. Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 2016; 51(11): 1821-1829. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2016001100004
Dickson A, Leaf AL, Hosner JF. Quality appraisal of white spruce and white pine seedling stock in nurseries. For Chron 1960; 36(1): 10-13. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc36010-1
BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Regras para análise de sementes. MAPA/ACS: Brasília 2009.
Brüning FO, Lúcio ADal’Col, Muniz MFB. Padrões para germinação, pureza, umidade e peso de mil sementes em análises de sementes de espécies florestais nativas do Rio Grande do Sul. Cienc Florest 2011; 21(2): 193-202. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050983221
Fortes FO, Lúcio ADC, Lopes SJ, Carpes RH, Silveira BDD. Agrupamento em amostras de sementes de espécies florestais nativas do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul-Brasil. Ciênc rural 2008; 38(6): 1615-1623.
Chinatto E, Baldissera FG, Avila AL. Caracterização e avaliação da germinação de sementes de cedro (Cedrela fissilis (vell.)) submetidas a diferentes substratos. Unoesc & Ciência-ACET 2011; 2(2): 129-138.
Kapoor N, Arya A, Siddiqui MA, Kumar H, Amir A. Physiological and biochemical changes during seed deterioration in aged seeds of rice (Oryza sativa L.). American J Plant Physiol 2011; 6(1): 28-35. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpp.2011.28.35
Girardi LB, Bellé RA, Lazarotto M, Michelon S, Girardi BA, Muniz MFB. Qualidade de sementes de cártamo colhidas em diferentes períodos de maturação. Rev Acad Ciên Anim 2017; 11(1): 67-73. https://doi.org/10.7213/academica.10.S01.AO08
Thirusendura Selvi D, Saraswathy S. Seed viability, seed deterioration and seed quality improvements in stored onion seeds: a review. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 2018; 93(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2017.1343103
Zuchi J, França-Neto JDB, Sediyama CS, Lacerda Filho AFD, Reis MS. Physiological quality of dynamically cooled and stored soybean seeds. J Seed Sci 2013; 35(3): 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-15372013000300012
Walters C. Orthodoxy, recalcitrance and in-between: describing variation in seed storage characteristics using threshold responses to water loss. Planta 2015; 242(2): 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2312-6
Paiva AS, Rodrigues TJD, Cancian AJ, Lopes MM, Fernandes AC. Qualidade de sementes de macrotiloma (Macrotyloma axillare) cv. Java. Rev Bras Sementes 2008; 30(2): 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31222008000200016
Souza CAM, Oliveira RB, Martins Filho S, Lima JS. Desenvolvimento em campo de espécies florestais em diferentes condições de adubação. Ci Fl 2006; 16(3): 243-249. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050981905
Silva RBG, Simões D, Silva MR. Qualidade de mudas clonais de Eucalyptus urophylla x E. grandis em função do substrato. Rev Bras de Eng Agricola e Ambient 2012; 16(3): 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662012000300010
Gomes JM, Couto L, Leite HG, Xavier A, Garcia SLR. Parâmetros morfológicos na avaliação da qualidade de mudas de Eucalyptus grandis. Rev Árvore 2002; 26(6): 655-664. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622002000600002
Ventura L, Donà M, Macovei A, Carbonera D, Buttafava A, Mondoni A et al. Understanding the molecular pathways associated with seed vigor. Plant Physiol Biochem 2012; 60: 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.07.031
Artur AG, Cruz MCP, Ferreira ME, Barretto VCM, Yagi R. Esterco bovino e calagem para formação de mudas de guanandi. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 2007; 42(6): 843-850. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2007000600011
Ataíde G, Castro R, Santana R, Dias B, Correia A, Mendes A. Efeito da densidade na bandeja sobre o crescimento de mudas de eucalipto. Rev Trópica 2010; 4(2): 21-26. https://doi.org/10.0000/rtcab.v4i2.152
Bellote AJF, Silva HD. Técnicas de amostragem e avaliações nutricionais em plantios de Eucalyptus spp. In: Gonçalves JLM, Benedetti V, Eds. Nutrição e fertilização florestal. Piracicaba: IPEF 2000; pp.135-166.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Davi da Silva, Carlos André Stuepp, IVAR WENDLING, Cristiane Helm, Rosimeri de Oliveira Fragoso, Alessandro Camargo Angelo