Keywords
Cell hydration
Leaf architecture
Universal primers
Multifaceted immunity
Common bean wilt disease
Systemic acquired resistance
How to Cite
Abstract
This greenhouse study evaluated the effects of two chemicals for priming kidney bean seedlings against bacterial wilt disease (Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. Flaccumfaciens) (CFF). The premise of this study was that the oxidant properties of chlorine dioxide would mimic the signaling properties of radical oxygen species thereby initiating a cascade of molecular plant defenses. The factorial study included two levels for the foliar chlorine dioxide treatment, two levels for the bacterial wilt inoculation treatment, and two optional treatments. The biomass variables included oven dry total plant biomass, oven dry fruit biomass, and oven dry leaf biomass. Also, foliage and total plant water content data was collected, as well as total leaf area. Specific leaf area (SLA) was estimated from the leaf area and biomass data. The primers had equivalent leaf area, plant and fruit biomass as the water control for the CFF wilt inoculated plants. The EB 400 mg/l primer reduced SLA for the CFF inoculated plants. Both EB formulations increased aboveground water content in the CFF wilt inoculated plants. Multivariate tables revealed several significant correlations among leaf architecture, plant tissue water content, and biomass growth parameters for the EB primers and the water control treatment for the two CFF wilt treatments. Re-allocation of plant resources from plant growth to plant defenses due to chemical primers were estimated and discussed to determine the tradeoffs between plant yield and enhanced plant defenses. The three articles in this study show that chlorine dioxide primers can initiate a series of ROS and salicylic acid signals. This interplay of ROS signals and salicylic acid signals generated by the chlorine dioxide primers activates a long-term SAR response that protects plants against future pathogen attacks. In addition, interaction of the ROS and salicylic acid signals activates a suite of defense mechanisms that provide universal, multifaceted plant immunity that can be sustained across a crop season.
References
Ramsey CL, Sandoval VM, Freebury PC, Newman DH, Dooley G, Cseke LJ, et al. Priming bean seedlings to boost natural plant defenses against common bacterial wilt: salicylic acid responses to chemical inducers. Glob J Agric Innov Res Dev. 2023; 10: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9813.2023.10.1
Ramsey CL, Sandoval VM, Freebury PC, Newman DH, Dooley G, Cseke LJ, et al. Priming bean seedlings to boost natural plant defenses against common bacterial wilt: gas exchange and fluorescence results (Part 2). Glob J Agric Innov Res Dev. 2023; 10: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9813.2023.10.1
Zhou J-M, Zhang Y. Plant immunity: danger perception and signaling. Cell. 2020; 181: 978-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.028
Hilker M, Schmülling T. Stress priming, memory, and signaling in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2019; 42: 753-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13526
Cooper A, Ton J. Immune priming in plants: from the onset to transgenerational maintenance. Essays Biochem. 2022; 66: 635-46. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20210082
Bhar A, Chakraborty A, Roy A. Plant responses to biotic stress: Old memories matter. Plants. 2021; 11(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010084
Goellner K, Conrath U. Priming: It's all the world to induced disease resistance. Eur J Plant Path. 2008; 121: 233-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-007-9251-4
Buswell W, Schwarzenbacher RE, Luna E, Sellwood M, Chen B, Flors V, et al. Chemical priming of immunity without costs to plant growth. New Phytologist. 2018; 218: 1205-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15062
Andersen E, Ali S, Byamukama E, Yen Y, Nepal M. Disease resistance mechanisms in plants. Genes (Basel). 2018; 9(7), 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070339
Doughari J. An overview of plant immunity. J Plant Pathol Microbiol. 2015; 11: 10-4172.
Vallad GE, Goodman RM. Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Sci. 2004; 44: 1920–34. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1920.
Conrath U. Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Signal Behav. 2006; 1: 179-84. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.1.4.3221
Gozzo F, Faoro F. Systemic acquired resistance (50 years after discovery): moving from the lab to the field. J Agric Food Chem. 2013; 61: 12473-91. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf404156x
Bürger M, Chory J. Stressed out about hormones: how plants orchestrate immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2019; 26: 163-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.006
Walters D, Walsh D, Newton A, Lyon G. Induced resistance for plant disease control: maximizing the efficacy of resistance elicitors. Phytopathology. 2005; 95: 1368-73. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-95-1368
Gaffney T, Friedrich L, Vernooij B, Negrotto D, Nye G, Uknes S, et al. Requirement of salicylic acid for the induction of systemic acquired resistance. Science. 1993; 261(5112): 754-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.261.5122.754
Durrant WE, Dong X. Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004; 42: 185-209. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421
Ramsey CL, Freebury PC, Newman DH, Schweigkofler W, Cseke LJ, Newman SE. Use of foliar chemical treatments to induce disease resistance in rhododendrons inoculated with phytophthora ramorum. Glob J Agric Innov Res Dev. 2022; 8: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9813.2021.08.1
Layman ML, Ramsey C, Schweigkofler W, Newman SE. Field evaluation of a novel, granular soil fumigant for controlling phytophthora ramorum in field nursery soils. Glob J Agric Innov Res Dev. 2020; 7: 12-9. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9813.2020.07.20
Cayanan DF, Zheng Y, Zhang P, Graham T, Dixon M, Chong C, et al. Sensitivity of five container-grown nursery species to chlorine in overhead irrigation water. HortScience. 2008; 43: 1882-7. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1882
Cayanan DF, Zhang P, Liu W, Dixon M, Zheng Y. Efficacy of chlorine in controlling five common plant pathogens. HortScience. 2009; 44: 157-63. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.44.1.157
Cayanan DF, Dixon M, Zheng Y, Llewellyn J. Response of container-grown nursery plants to chlorine used to disinfest irrigation water. HortScience. 2009; 44: 164-7. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.44.1.164
Kim M, Kumar S, Kwon H, Kim W, Kim Y. Influence of reactive oxygen species produced by chlorine dioxide on induction of insect cell apoptosis. Korean J Appl Entomol. 2016; 5: 267-75. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2016.07.0.034
Andrés CMC, Lastra JMP de la, Andrés Juan C, Plou FJ, Pérez-Lebeña E. Chlorine dioxide: friend or foe for cell biomolecules? A chemical approach. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(24): 15660. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415660
Vellosillo T, Vicente J, Kulasekaran S, Hamberg M, Castresana C. Emerging complexity in reactive oxygen species production and signaling during the response of plants to pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2010; 154: 444-8. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.161273
Jwa N-S, Hwang BK. Convergent evolution of pathogen effectors toward reactive oxygen species signaling networks in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01687
Alvarez ME, Pennell RI, Meijer P-J, Ishikawa A, Dixon RA, Lamb C. Reactive oxygen intermediates mediate a systemic signal network in the establishment of plant immunity. Cell. 1998; 92: 773-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81405-1
Yang X, Lu M, Wang Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, Chen S. Response mechanism of plants to drought stress. Horticulture. 2021; 7(3): 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7030050
Ilyas M, Nisar M, Khan N, Hazrat A, Khan AH, Hayat K, et al. Drought tolerance strategies in plants: a mechanistic approach. J Plant Growth Regul. 2021; 40: 926-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10174-5
Zhou HY, Li SG, Li XR, Zhao AF, Zhao HL, Fan HW, et al. Ecophysiological evidence for the competition strategy of two psammophytes, Artemisia philodendron and A. frigida, in Horqin sandy land, Nei Mongol. Acta Bot Sin. 2004; 46: 284-93.
Singh V, Pallaghy CK, Singh D. Phosphorus nutrition and tolerance of cotton to water stress: II. Water relations, free and bound water, and leaf expansion rate. Field Crops Res. 2006; 96: 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.06.011
Ignatov I, Huether F, Neshev N, Kiselova-Kaneva Y, Popova TP, Bankova R, et al. Research of water molecules clusters.structuring during Haberlea rhodopensis Friv. Plants. 2022; 11(19), 2655. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192655
Toome M, Heinsoo K, Luik A. Relation between leaf rust (Melampsora epitea) severity and the specific leaf area in short rotation coppice willows. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2010; 126: 583-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9566-4
Smith AH, Potts BM, Ratkowsky DA, Pinkard EA, Mohammed CL. Association of Eucalyptus globulus leaf anatomy with susceptibility to Teratosphaeria leaf disease. For Pathol. 2018; 48: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12395
Vincent L, Soorianathasundaram K, Shivashankara KS. Correlation of leaf parameters with incidence of papaya ring spot virus in cultivated papaya and its wild relatives. J Hortl Sci. 2019; 14(2): 130-6. https://doi.org/10.24154/JHS.2019.v14i02.007
Manjunatha L, Ramappa HK, Rangaswamy KT. Role of leaf morphology in defense against sterility mosaic disease of pigeon pea. J Environ Biol. 2018; 39: 298-305. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/39/3/MRN-389
Ebrahim S, Usha K, Singh B. Plant architectural traits and their role in defense mechanism against malformation in mango (Mangifera Indica L.). Sci Hortic. 2012; 139: 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.02.025
Mason CM, Bowsher AW, Crowell BL, Celoy RM, Tsai C, Donovan LA. Macroevolution of leaf defenses and secondary metabolites across the genus Helianthus. New Phytologist. 2016; 209: 1720-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13749
Wang B, Tian C, Liang Y. Landscape and stand-scale factors drive the infestation of an endemic fungal pathogen: The role of leaf traits. For Ecol Manage. 2022; 514: 120213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120213
Osdaghi E, Young AJ, Harveson RM. Bacterial wilt of dry beans caused by Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens: A new threat from an old enemy. Mol Plant Pathol. 2020; 21: 605-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12926
Harveson RM, Schwartz HF, Vidaver AK, Lambrecht PA, Otto KL. New outbreaks of bacterial wilt of dry beans in Nebraska were observed from field infections. Plant Dis. 2006; 90: 681-681. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-90-0681A
Sammer UF, Reiher K. Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens on Soybean in Germany - A threat for farming. J Phytopathol. 2012; 160: 314-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2012.01902.x
Conner RL, Balasubramanian P, Erickson RS, Huang HC, Mündel HH. Bacterial wilt resistance in kidney beans. Can J Plant Sci. 2008; 88: 1109-13. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJPS08074
Yadeta KA, J. Thomma BPH. The xylem is a battleground for plant hosts and vascular wilt pathogens. Front Plant Sci. 2013; 4: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00097
Rajendram D, Ayenza R, Holder FM, Moran B, Long T, Shah HN. Long-term storage and safe retrieval of DNA from microorganisms for molecular analysis using FTA matrix cards. J Microbiol Methods. 2006; 67: 582-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2006.05.010
Cerezini P, Kuwano BH, Neiverth W, Grunvald AK, Pípolo AE, Hungria M, et al. Physiological and N2-fixation-related traits for tolerance to drought in soybean progenies. Pesqui Agropecu Bras. 2019; 54: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2019.v54.00839
Tan Z-H, Wu Z-X, Hughes AC, Schaefer D, Zeng J, Lan G-Y, et al. On the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 (c i/c a) derived from ecosystem flux. Int J Biometeorol. 2017; 61: 2059-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-017-1403-4
Acuna H, Inostroza L, Tapi G. Strategies for selecting drought tolerant germplasm in forage legume species. Water Stress, Croatia: InTech; 2012. https://doi.org/10.5772/30744
Groszmann M, Osborn HL, Evans JR. Carbon dioxide and water transport through plant aquaporins. Plant Cell Environ. 2017; 40: 938-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12844
Talik P, Piwowarczyk J, Muszyńska B, Hubicka U. DSC study of hydration and water-holding behavior of cultured in vitro mycelium and naturally grown fruiting bodies of freeze-dried Boletus badius, Agaricus bisporus, and Cantharellus cibarius. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021; 143: 3525-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09654-3
Chycki J, Zając T, Maszczyk A, Kurylas A. The effect of mineral-based alkaline water on hydration status and the metabolic response to short-term anaerobic exercise. Biol Sport. 2017; 3: 255-61. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2017.66003
Ignatov I, Bauer O. Vortex power spring water: Physical-chemical qualities of this water compared to the mountain and meltwater from Bulgaria, Russia and Glacier Rosenlaui from Swiss Alps. Advances in Physics Theories and Applications. 2015; 45: 6-29.
Parker WC, Dey DC. Influence of overstory density on ecophysiology of red oak (Quercus rubra) and sugar maple (Acer saccharum) seedlings in central Ontario shelterwoods. Tree Physiol. 2008; 28: 797-804. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/28.5.797
Conner RL, Balasubramanian P, Erickson RS, Huang HC, Mündel H-H. Bacterial wilt resistance in kidney beans. Can J Plant Sci. 2008; 88: 1109-13. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJPS08074
Pollack GH. Cell electrical properties: reconsidering the origin of the electrical potential. Cell Biol Int. 2015; 39: 237-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbin.10382
Pollack GH. The fourth phase of water. Nutrition and Integrative Medicine, Seattle: Ebner & Sons Publishers; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315153155-18
Pollack G, Figueroa X, Zhao Q. Molecules, water, and radiant energy: new clues for the origin of life. Int J Mol Sci. 2009; 10: 1419-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10041419
Pollack GH. Water, energy, and life: fresh views from the water's edge. Int J Des Nat Ecodynamics. 2010; 5: 27-9. https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V5-N1-27-29
Ho M. Life is water electric. In: Rosch PJ, Ed., Bioelectromagnetic and Subtle Energy Medicine. Routledge; 2014, p. 93.
Ho MW. Living Rainbow H2O. World Scientific; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1142/8418
Shan Z, Luo X, Wei M, Huang T, Khan A, Zhu Y. Physiological and proteomic analysis on long-term drought resistance of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 17982. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35711-x
Zhang DY. Effect of water stress on some physiology indices of pepper leaves. Hubei Agricultural Sciences. 2010; 49: 819-21.
Khan MIH, Wellard RM, Nagy SA, Joardder MUH, Karim MA. Investigation of bound and free water in plant-based food material using NMR T 2 relaxometry. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2016; 38: 252-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2016.10.015
Rascio A. Bound water in plants and its relationships to the abiotic stresses. Recent Research Developments in Plant Physiology. 1997; 1: 215-22.
Rascio A, Russo M, Platani C, Di Fonzo N. Drought intensity effects on genotypic differences in tissue affinity for strongly bound water. Plant Sci. 1998; 132: 121-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00006-5
Kuroki S, Tsenkova R, Moyankova D, Muncan J, Morita H, Atanassova S, et al. Water molecular structure underpins extreme desiccation tolerance of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39443-4
Zhou H, Li S, Li X, Zhao A, Zhao H, Fan H, et al. Ecophysiological evidence for the competition strategy of two psammophytes, Artemisia philodendron and A. frigida, in Horqin sandy land, Nei Mongo. Acta Bot Sin. 2004; 46: 284-93.
Jiao S, Zeng F, Huang Y, Zhang L, Mao J, Chen B. Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses associated with drought tolerance in grafted grapevine. BMC Plant Biol. 2023; 23: 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04109-x
Sharma A, Adams C, Cashdollar BD, Li Z, Nguyen NV, Sai H, et al. Effect of health-promoting agents on exclusion-zone size. Dose-Response 2018; 16(3): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325818796937
Jiao S, Zeng F, Huang Y, Zhang L, Mao J, Chen B. Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses associated with drought tolerance in grafted grapevine. BMC Plant Biol. 2023; 23: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04109-x
Farooq M, Basra SMA, Wahid A, Ahmad N, Saleem BA. Improving the drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by exogenous application of salicylic acid. J Agron Crop Sci. 2009; 195: 237-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00365.x
Sohag AAM, Tahjib-Ul-Arif Md, Brestič M, Afrin S, Sakil MdA, Hossain MdT, et al. Exogenous salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide attenuate drought stress in rice. Plant Soil Environ. 2020; 66: 7-13. https://doi.org/10.17221/472/2019-PSE
Ahmad A, Aslam Z, Naz M, Hussain S, Javed T, Aslam S, et al. Exogenous salicylic acid-induced drought stress tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under hydroponic culture. PLoS One. 2021; 16(12): e0260556. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260556
Kadioglu A, Saruhan N, Sağlam A, Terzi R, Acet T. Exogenous salicylic acid alleviates effects of long-term drought stress and delays leaf rolling by inducing antioxidant system. Plant Growth Regul. 2011; 64: 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9532-3
Koche D, Ruchita G, Rathod S, Shirsat R. An update on the role of salicylic acid (SA) in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants: A review. Agric Biol Res. 2021; 37: 219-25.
Khalid MF, Saleem MS, Zakir I, Khan RI, Sohail M, Ejaz S, et al. Salicylic acid-induced abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Stress Mitigators, Elsevier; 2023, p. 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89871-3.00008-2
Sasheva P, Yordanova R, Janda T, Szalai G, Maslenkova L. Study of primary photosynthetic reactions in winter wheat cultivars after cold hardening and freezing. effect of salicylic acid. Bulgarian J Agric Sci. 2013; 19: 45-8.
Saleem M, Fariduddin Q, Janda T. Multifaceted role of salicylic acid in combating cold stress in plants: A review. J Plant Growth Regul. 2021; 40: 464-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10152-x
Kuroki S, Tsenkova R, Moyankova D, Muncan J, Morita H, Atanassova S, et al. Water molecular structure underpins extreme desiccation tolerance of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 3049. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39443-4
Kuroki S, Tsenkova R, Moyankova D, Muncan J, Morita H, Atanassova S, et al. Water molecular structure underpins extreme desiccation tolerance of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39443-4
Muncan J, Jinendra BMS, Kuroki S, Tsenkova R. Aquaphotomics research of cold stress in soybean cultivars with different stress tolerance ability: Early detection of cold stress response. Molecules. 2022; 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030744
Tsegaw M, Zegeye WA, Jiang B, Sun S, Yuan S, Han T, et al. Progress and prospects of the molecular basis of soybean cold tolerance. Plants. 2023; 12(3): 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030459
Jhon MS. The water puzzle and the hexagonal key. USA: Uplifting; 2004.
Pollack G. The fourth phase of water. WA: Ebner and Sons Publishers: Seattle; 2013.
Ramsey CL. Application of a structured water generator for crop irrigation: Structured water, drought tolerance, and alteration of plant defense mechanisms to abiotic stressors. J Basic Appl Sci. 2021; 17: 127-52. https://doi.org/10.29169/1927-5129.2021.17.14
Ramsey CL. Application of a structured water generator for crop irrigation: Structured water, drought tolerance, and alteration of plant defense mechanisms to abiotic stressors. J Basic Appl Sci. 2021; 17: 127-52. https://doi.org/10.29169/1927-5129.2021.17.14
Shalatonin V, Pollack GH. Magnetic fields induce exclusion zones in water. PLoS One. 2022; 17(5): e0268747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268747
Alattar E, Radwan E, Elwasife K. Improvement in growth of plants under the effect of magnetized water. AIMS Biophys. 2022; 9: 346-87. https://doi.org/10.3934/biophy.2022029
El-Basir A. Tomato production using magnetized agriculture drainage water. J Plant Prod. 2021; 12: 231-41. https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2021.155641
Ospina-Salazar D, Rachmilevitch S, Cuervo-Jurado S. Biomass accumulation and physiological responses of tomato plants to magnetically-treated water in hydroponic conditions. BioRxiv. [Preprint] https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.21.461287
Ramsey C. Effects of magnetized, chelated iron foliage treatments on foliar physiology, plant growth and drought tolerance for two legume species. Glob J Agric Innov Res Dev. 2022; 8: 66-86. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9813.2021.08.5
Zlotopolski V. Magnetic treatment reduces water usage in irrigation without negatively impacting yield, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake in lettuce. Internat J Applied Agric Sci. 2017; 3: 117-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20170305.13
Yusuf KO, Ogunbamowo TR, Obalowu RO. Effect of magnetized water on water use efficiency, yield, and nutritional qualities of watermelon under deficit irrigation. CIGR J. 2020; 22: 51-60.
Fayed MH, Ghanem HG, Sheta MH, Ali AA. Effect of magnetized water on water use efficiency of spinach under North Sinai conditions. Misr J Agri Eng. 2021; 38: 137-54. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2021.66391.1027
Abedinpour M, Rohani E. Effects of magnetized water application on soil and maize growth indices under different amounts of salt in the water. J. Water Reuse Desalin. 2017; 7: 319-25. https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2016.216
Zlotopolski V. Magnetic treatment reduces water usage in irrigation without negatively impacting yield, photosynthesis and nutrient uptake in lettuce. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2017; 3: 117-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20170305.13
Selim DA-FH, Nassar RMA, Boghdady MS, Bonfill M. Physiological and anatomical studies of two wheat cultivars irrigated with magnetic water under drought stress conditions. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019; 135: 480-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.11.012
Baghel L, Kataria S, Guruprasad KN. Effect of static magnetic field pretreatment on growth, photosynthetic performance, and yield of soybean under water stress. Photosynthetica. 2018; 56: 718-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-017-0722-3
Yusuf KO, Ogunlela AO. Effects of deficit irrigation on the growth and yield of tomato irrigated with magnetized water. Nig J Pure Appl Sci. 2016; 29: 2824-35.
Ogunlela A, Yusuf K. Effects of water stress on growth and yield of tomato irrigated with magnetically treated water. Nig J Pure Appl Sci. 2016; 29: 2824-35.
Hasanuzzaman M, Bhuyan MHM, Zulfiqar F, Raza A, Mohsin S, Mahmud J, et al. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants. 2020; 9: 681. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681
Dumanović J, Nepovimova E, Natić M, Kuča K, Jaćević V. The significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense system in plants: A concise overview. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 11: Article 552969. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.552969
Lukan T, Coll A. Intertwined roles of reactive oxygen species and salicylic acid signaling are crucial for the plant response to biotic stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(10): 5568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105568
Herrera-Vasquez A, Salinas P, Holuigue L. Salicylic acid and reactive oxygen species interplay in the transcriptional control of defense genes expression. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6: 171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00171
Voeikov VL. Reactive Oxygen Species—(ROS) pathogens or sources of vital energy? part 1. ros in normal and pathologic physiology of living systems. J Altern Complement Med. 2006; 12: 111-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2006.12.111
Voeikov VL. Biological oxidation: Over a century of hardship for the concept of active oxygen. Cell Mol Biol. 2005; 51: 663-75. https://doi.org/10.1170/T677
Voeikov VL. The fundamental role of water in bioenergetics. Biophotonics and Coherent Systems in Biology, Boston, MA: Springer US; 2007, p. 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-28417-0_7
Voeikov V. Reactive oxygen species, water, photons and life. Riv Biol. 2001; 94(2): 237-58.
Voeikov VL. The key role of stable nonequilibrium state of aqueous systems in bioenergetics. Russian J Gen Chem. 2011; 81: 209-19. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363211010385
Graham T, Zhang P, Woyzbun E, Dixon M. Response of hydroponic tomato to daily applications of aqueous ozone via drip irrigation. Sci Hortic. 2011; 129: 464-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.04.019
Habib N, Ali Q, Ali S, Javed MT, Zulqurnain Haider M, Perveen R, et al. Use of nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide for better yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under water deficit conditions: growth, osmoregulation, and antioxidative defense mechanism. Plants. 2020; 9(2): 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020285
Rahman MA, Alam I, Sharmin SA, Kabir AH, Kim Y-G, Liu G, et al. Physiological and proteomic analyses reveal the protective roles of exogenous hydrogen peroxide in alleviating drought stress in soybean plants. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2021; 15: 805-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-021-00719-9
dos Santos Araújo G, de Oliveira Paula-Marinho S, de Paiva Pinheiro SK, de Castro Miguel E, de Sousa Lopes L, Camelo Marques E, et al. H2O2 priming promotes salt tolerance in maize by protecting chloroplasts ultrastructure and primary metabolites modulation. Plant Sci. 2021; 303: 110774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110774
Martino CF, Castello PR. Modulation of hydrogen peroxide production in cellular systems by low-level magnetic fields. PLoS One. 2011; 6: 237-342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022753
Sherin G, Aswathi KPR, Puthur JT. Photosynthetic functions in plants subjected to stresses are positively influenced by priming. Plant Stress. 2022; 4: 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2022.100079
Hammack H. Increased chlorophyll efficiency of dark-adapted camellia foliage when treated with chlorine dioxide or hydrogen dioxide and blended with a non-ionic surfactant (Masters thesis). Colorado State University; 2013.
Llorens E, González-Hernández AI, Scalschi L, Fernández-Crespo E, Camañes G, Vicedo B, et al. Priming mediated stress and cross-stress tolerance in plants: Concepts and opportunities. In: Hossain MA, Liu F, Burritt DJ, Fujita M, Huang B, Eds., Priming-Mediated Stress and Cross-Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants, Elsevier; 2020, p. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817892-8.00001-5
Sherin G, Aswathi KPR, Puthur JT. Photosynthetic functions in plants subjected to stresses are positively influenced by priming. Plant Stress. 2022; 4: 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2022.100079
Mohammedsani Z. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and its application in crop plants improvement to biotic stresses: Review. Int J Res Stud Sci Eng Technol. 2018; 5: 17-24.
Kamle M, Borah R, Bora H, Jaiswal AK, Singh RK, Kumar P. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR): role and mechanism of action against phytopathogens. In: Hesham AL, Upadhyay RS, Sharma GD, Manoharachary C, Gupta VK, Eds., Fungal biotechnology and bioengineering. Switzerland: Springer Cham; 2020, p. 457-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41870-0_20
Maithani D, Singh H, Sharma A. Stress alleviation in plants using SAR and ISR: Current views on stress signaling network. In: Sharma A, Ed., Microbes and signaling biomolecules against plant stress: strategies of plant-microbe relationships for better survival. 2021, p. 7-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7094-0_2
Dutta H, Kumar RG, Borah M. Efficacy of biotic and chemical inducers of SAR in management of plant viruses. Int J Econ Plants. 2019; 6: 130-5. https://doi.org/10.23910/IJEP/2019.6.3.0323
Shine MB, Xiao X, Kachroo P, Kachroo A. Signaling mechanisms underlying systemic acquired resistance to microbial pathogens. Plant Sci. 2019; 279: 81-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.01.001
Filgueiras CC, Martins AD, Pereira RV, Willett DS. The ecology of salicylic acid signaling: Primary, secondary and tertiary effects with applications in agriculture. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(23), 5851. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235851
Bürger M, Chory J. Stressed out about hormones: how plants orchestrate immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2019; 26: 163-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.006
Peng Y, Yang J, Li X, Zhang Y. Salicylic acid: biosynthesis and signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2021; 72: 761-91. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-081320-092855
Zhang Y, Li X. Salicylic acid: biosynthesis, perception, and contributions to plant immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2019; 50: 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2019.02.004
Mishra A, Baek K-H. Salicylic acid biosynthesis and metabolism: A divergent pathway for plants and bacteria. Biomolecules. 2021; 11: 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11050705
van Butselaar T, Van den Ackerveken G. Salicylic acid steers the growth–immunity tradeoff. Trends Plant Sci. 2020; 25: 566-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2020.02.002
Gozzo F, Faoro F. Systemic acquired resistance (50 years after discovery): moving from the lab to the field. J Agric Food Chem. 2013; 61: 12473-91. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf404156x
Ross AF. Systemic acquired resistance induced by localized virus infections in plants. Virology. 1961; 14: 340-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(61)90319-1
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Craig Ramsey, Vanessa M. Sandoval, Paul C. Freebury, Debra H. Newman, Greg Dooley, Leland J. Cseke, Steven E. Newman