Economic Efficiency of Applying Biological Growth Regulators for Growing Sunflower in the Zone of Steppe Soils
PDF

Keywords

Moisture supply
Sunflower hybrids
Climatic conditions
Economic efficiency
Biological plant growth regulators

How to Cite

1.
Domaratskiy Y, Potravka L, Pichura V. Economic Efficiency of Applying Biological Growth Regulators for Growing Sunflower in the Zone of Steppe Soils. Glob. J. Agric. Innov. Res. Dev [Internet]. 2023 Oct. 19 [cited 2024 Jul. 1];10:92-101. Available from: https://avantipublisher.com/index.php/gjaird/article/view/1431

Abstract

In the conditions of climate change, the selection and adjustment of crop cultivation systems in the moisture deficit zone and the management of risky agriculture to ensure the profitability of production remain an urgent issues. In particular, the Steppe of Ukraine is a zone of increased risk for agricultural production, which is associated with difficult climatic conditions characterized by droughts and low rainfall. An effective measure to ensure stable harvests is the use of growth-regulating biological preparations. Therefore, the purpose of the research was to establish the regularities of the influence of growth-regulating biological preparations on the formation of productivity and the economic efficiency of sunflower cultivation in the zone of risky agriculture. The study was conducted in 2021–2022 in the Mykolaiv region of Ukraine. A three-factor field experiment was set up to study the influence of various biological preparations (Helafit Combi, Organic Balance, and Biocomplex-BTU) and plant stand density (30, 40, and 50 thousand pcs/ha) on the productivity of sunflower hybrids Vyrii, Yarylo, Blysk, Yaskravyi, and Epikur. It was found that the hybrids Yarylo, Epikur, and Yaskravyi had considerably lower levels of productivity. However, foliar fertilization had a positive effect and contributed to an increase in their productivity. A low level of productivity in 2022 (1.51 t/ha) was observed in the hybrid Epikur under the plant density of 30 thousand pcs/ha. The results of the field experiments allowed establishing that foliar fertilization with different biological preparations is an efficient and effective method for improving plant growth conditions, and can increase the level of agrocenosis genetic potential realization. It was found that the hybrid Vyrii with a seeding rate of 40 thousand pcs/ha and plant treatment with the biological preparation Helafit Combi is the most economically efficient hybrid, with a profitability of 25.59%, and a net profit of $127.20 per ha.

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9813.2023.10.5
PDF

References

Lisetskiia F, Pichura V. Steppe ecosystem functioning of east European plain under age-long climatic change influence. Indian J Sci Technol. 2016; 9: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i18/93780

Dudiak NV, Potravka LA, Stroganov AA. Soil and climatic bonitation of agricultural lands of the steppe zone of Ukraine. Ind J Ecol. 2019; 46: 534-40.

Zhang H, Huo S, Yeager KM, Li C, Xi B, Zhang J, et al. Apparent relationships between anthropogenic factors and climate change indicators and POPs deposition in a lacustrine system. J Environ Sci. 2019; 83: 174-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2019.03.024

Pichura V, Potravka L, Vdovenko N, Biloshkurenko O, Stratichuk N, Baysha K. Changes in climate and bioclimatic potential in the steppe zone of ukraine. J Ecol Eng. 2022; 23: 189-202. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/154844

USDA-ERS. Agricultural resources and environmental indicators. Washington: 2012.

Mateo-Sanchis A, Piles M, Amorós-López J, Muñoz-Marí J, Adsuara JE, Moreno-Martínez Á, et al. Learning main drivers of crop progress and failure in Europe with interpretable machine learning. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2021; 104: 102574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102574

Skok S, Breus D, Almashova V. Assessment of the effect of biological growth-regulating preparations on the yield of agricultural crops under the conditions of steppe zone. J Ecol Eng. 2023; 24: 135-44. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/163494

Zhigailo O, Zhigailo T. Assessment of the impact of climate change on the agroclimatic conditions of sunflower cultivation in Ukraine. Ukr Hydrometeor J. 2016; 17: 86-92.

Nielsen DC, Unger PW, Miller PR. Efficient water use in dryland cropping systems in the great plains. Agron J. 2005; 97: 364-72. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0364

Domaratskiy Y, Bazaliy V, Dobrovol’skiy A, Pichura V, Kozlova O. Influence of eco-safe growth-regulating substances on the phytosanitary state of agrocenoses of wheat varieties of various types of development in non-irrigated conditions of the steppe zone. J Ecol Eng. 2022; 23: 298-307. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/150865

Andati P, Majiwa E, Ngigi M, Mbeche R, Ateka J. Effect of climate smart agriculture technologies on crop yields: Evidence from potato production in Kenya. Clim Risk Manag. 2023; 41: 100539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2023.100539

Liu Y, Cao H, Du C, Zhang Z, Zhou X, Yao C, et al. Novel water-saving cultivation system maintains crop yield while reducing environmental costs in North China Plain. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2023; 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107111

Dobermann A, Bruulsema T, Cakmak I, Gerard B, Majumdar K, McLaughlin M, et al. Responsible plant nutrition: A new paradigm to support food system transformation. Glob Food Sec. 2022; 33: 100636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100636

Qiu Y, Li X, Tang Y, Xiong S, Han Y, Wang Z, et al. Directly linking plant N, P and K nutrition to biomass production in cotton-based intercropping systems. Eur J Agron. 2023; 151: 126960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126960

Vinas M, Mendez JC, Jiménez VM. Effect of foliar applications of phosphites on growth, nutritional status and defense responses in tomato plants. Sci Hortic. 2020; 265: 109200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109200

Ishfaq M, Kiran A, ur Rehman H, Farooq M, Ijaz NH, Nadeem F, et al. Foliar nutrition: Potential and challenges under multifaceted agriculture. Environ Exp Bot. 2022; 200: 104909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104909

Selanon O, Saetae D, Suntornsuk W. Utilization of Jatropha curcas seed cake as a plant growth stimulant. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2014; 3: 114-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2014.08.001

Kitano H, Choi J-H, Ueda A, Ito H, Hagihara S, Kan T, et al. Discovery of plant growth stimulants by C–H arylation of 2-azahypoxanthine. Org Lett. 2018; 20: 5684-7. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.8b02407

Asif M, Adnan M, Safdar ME, Akhtar N, Khalofah A, Alzuaibr FM. Integrated use of phosphorus and growth stimulant (actibion) improves yield and quality of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). J King Saud Univ Sci. 2022; 34: 102236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102236

Reckling M, Bergkvist G, Watson CA, Stoddard FL, Zander PM, Walker RL, et al. Trade-offs between economic and environmental impacts of introducing legumes into cropping systems. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: Article number 669. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00669

Li J, Huang L, Zhang J, Coulter JA, Li L, Gan Y. Diversifying crop rotation improves system robustness. Agron Sustain Dev. 2019; 39: 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0584-0

Sanford GR, Jackson RD, Booth EG, Hedtcke JL, Picasso V. Perenniality and diversity drive output stability and resilience in a 26-year cropping systems experiment. Field Crop Res. 2021; 263: 108071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108071

Domaratskiy Y, Berdnikova O, Bazaliy V, Shcherbakov V, Gamayunova V, Larchenko O, et al. Dependence of winter wheat yielding capacity on mineral nutrition in irrigation conditions of southern steppe of Ukraine. Ind J Ecol. 2019; 46: 594-8.

Korkhova M, Panfilova A, Domaratskiy Y, Smirnova I. Productivity of winter wheat (T. Aestivum, T. Durum, T. Spelta) depending on varietal Characteristics in the context of climate change. Ecol Eng Environ Technol. 2023; 24: 236-44. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/163124

Singh AL, Singh S, Kurella A, Verma A, Mahatama MK, Venkatesh I. Plant bio-stimulants, their functions and use in enhancing stress tolerance in oilseeds. In: Singh HB, Vaishnav A, Eds. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Elsevier; 2022, p. 239–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85579-2.00003-4

Pichura V, Domaratskiy Y, Potravka L, Biloshkurenko O, Dobrovol’skiy A. Application of the research on spatio-temporal differentiation of a vegetation index in evaluating sunflower hybrid plasticity and growth-regulators in the steppe zone of Ukraine. J Ecol Eng. 2023; 24: 144-65. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/162782

Bonanomi G, Zotti M, Abd-ElGawad AM, Iacomino G, Nappi A, Grauso L, et al. Plant-growth promotion by biochar-organic amendments mixtures explained by selective chemicals adsorption of inhibitory compounds. J Environ Chem Eng. 2023; 11: 109009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.109009

Andrienko A, Andrienko O. Sunflower: Ukraine and the world. Agronmy Today Sunflower 2020; 1: 7-13.

Koutroubas SD, Antoniadis V, Damalas CA, Fotiadis S. Sunflower growth and yield response to sewage sludge application under contrasting water availability conditions. Ind Crops Prod. 2020; 154: 112670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112670

Jan AU, Hadi F, Ditta A, Suleman M, Ullah M. Zinc-induced anti-oxidative defense and osmotic adjustments to enhance drought stress tolerance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Environ Exp Bot. 2022; 193: 104682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104682

Forleo MB, Palmieri N, Suardi A, Coaloa D, Pari L. The eco-efficiency of rapeseed and sunflower cultivation in Italy. Joining environmental and economic assessment. J Clean Prod. 2018; 172: 3138-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.094

Giannini V, Mula L, Carta M, Patteri G, Roggero PP. Interplay of irrigation strategies and sowing dates on sunflower yield in semi-arid Mediterranean areas. Agric Water Manag. 2022; 260: 107287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107287

Petrenko V, Topalov A, Khudolii L, Honcharuk Y, Bondar V. Profiling and geographical distribution of seed oil content of sunflower in Ukraine. Oil Crop Sci. 2023; 8: 111-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocsci.2023.05.002

Shakaliy SN, Bagan A V., Barabolia O V. Productivity of sunflower hybrids depending on cultivation density and interlines width. Scientific Reports of NULES of Ukraine 2019; 5(81): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2019.05.003

Revtyo O, Domaratskyi Y. Optimizing the production process of sunflower agrocenoses under arid conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine. Agrar Innov. 2021; 5: 68-74.

Lombardo L, Coppola G, Zelasco S. New technologies for insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant plants. Trends Biotechnol. 2016; 34: 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.10.006

Bartucca ML, Di Michele A, Del Buono D. Interference of three herbicides on iron acquisition in maize plants. Chemosphere. 2018; 206: 424-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.040

Clapp J. Explaining growing glyphosate use: The political economy of herbicide-dependent agriculture. Glob Environ Change. 2021; 67: 102239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102239

Chen G, An K, Chen Y, Zhuang X. Double-spraying with different routes significantly improved control efficacies of herbicides applied by unmanned aerial spraying system: A case study with rice herbicides. Crop Protec. 2023; 167: 106203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106203

Unakıtan G, Aydın B. A comparison of energy use efficiency and economic analysis of wheat and sunflower production in Turkey: A case study in Thrace Region. Energy. 2018; 149: 279-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.033

Galliano D, Magrini M-B, Tardy C, Triboulet P. Eco-innovation in plant breeding: Insights from the sunflower industry. J Clean Prod. 2018; 172: 2225-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.189

Abdel-Rahman AA, Kesba HH, Al-Sayed AA. Activity and reproductive capability of Meloidogyne incognita and sunflower growth response as influenced by root exudates of some medicinal plants. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2019; 22: 101418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101418

Zhang J, Du L, Xing Z, Zhang R, Li F, Zhong T, et al. Effects of dual mulching with wheat straw and plastic film under three irrigation regimes on soil nutrients and growth of edible sunflower. Agric Water Manag. 2023; 288: 108453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108453

Del Gatto A, Pieri S, Mangoni L, Maria Fedeli A. Selection of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) high oleic maintainer lines. J Biotechnol. 2010; 150: 487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.09.745

Dhima K, Vasilakoglou I, Paschalidis KA, Gatsis T, Keco R. Productivity and phytotoxicity of six sunflower hybrids and their residues effects on rotated lentil and ivy-leaved speedwell. Field Crops Res. 2012; 136: 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.07.016

Sher A, Suleman M, Sattar A, Qayyum A, Ijaz M, Allah S-U, et al. Achene yield and oil quality of diverse sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids are affected by different irrigation sources. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2022; 34: 102016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102016

Khmarsky M. A simple solution to complex problems. Special Issue, Sunflower 2017: 36–7.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Yevhenii Domaratskiy, Larysa Potravka, Vitalii Pichura