On-farm Pre-extension Demonstration of Newly Released Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) Technology with Proper Agronomic Practices in Gamo and Konso Zones of Southern Ethiopia
PDF

Keywords

Boreda
Legume
Karat Zuria
Sole cropping
Ashenafi (ICEAP00554)
Proper agronomic practice

How to Cite

1.
Lemma LL, Wada AB, Bune ME. On-farm Pre-extension Demonstration of Newly Released Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) Technology with Proper Agronomic Practices in Gamo and Konso Zones of Southern Ethiopia. Glob. J. Agric. Innov. Res. Dev [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 29 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];11:1-11. Available from: https://avantipublisher.com/index.php/gjaird/article/view/1503

Abstract

Pigeon pea is widely cultivated by Ethiopian farmers, but its production remains low despite suitable conditions. This is partly due to inadequate demonstration of new pigeon pea varieties with proper agronomic practices. To address this, Arba Minch Agricultural Research Center released a new variety, Ashenafi, which showed promise in adaptation trials. However, its farmer preference and socio-economic benefits were not assessed. Therefore, a pre-extension demonstration of Ashenafi and a local check was conducted in 2024 at Karat Zuria and Boreda districts to improve pigeon pea production. The demonstration covered 20 farmers’ fields and 2 Farmers Training Centers, with 10m x 50m plots for each variety, using a spacing of 1.2m between rows and 0.5m between plants, a seed rate of 3 kg/ha, and a fertilizer rate of 100 kg/ha NPS. Grain yield data and farmer preferences were collected and analyzed. Ashenafi yielded 1,860 kg/ha compared to the local variety's 1,065 kg/ha at Karat Zuria, and 1,785 kg/ha compared to 890 kg/ha at Boreda. Results at the Farmers Training Center were similar. The significant yield gap of 787 kg/ha suggests a need to encourage adoption of the new variety. Ashenafi proved more profitable and was preferred by farmers for its earliness, quick branch emergence, seed size, grain yield, and pod number. Thus, Ashenafi is recommended for wider production with proper agronomic practices.

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9813.2024.11.1
PDF

References

FAOSTAT. Pigeon pea production in Kenya 2000-2013. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2015.

FAOSTAT. FAO Statistical Database. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2017.

FAOSTAT. TIA National Surveys for Mozambique-2012, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2014.

Varshney RK, Chen W, Li Y, Bharti AK, Saxena RK, Schlueter JA, et al. Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 30(1): 83-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2022

Zhao J, Bayer PE, Ruperao P, Saxena RK, Khan AW, Golicz AA, et al. Trait associations in the pangenome of pigeon pea (Cajanus Cajan). Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18(9): 1946-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13354

Choudhary AK, Raje RS, Datta S, Sultana R, Ontagodi T. Conventional and molecular approaches towards genetic improvement for insects resistance in pigeon pea. Am J Plant Sci. 2013; 4: 372-85. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.42A049

Esther O, Victoria A. Analysis of the current situation and future outlooks for pigeon pea (Cajanus Cajan) production in Oyo State, Nigeria: a Markov chain model approach. J Agr Food Res. 2021; 6: Article ID 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100218

Esan VI, Ojemola OL. Evaluation of production system, traditional knowledge of pigeon pea (Cajanus Cajan) and risks of extinction of pigeon pea, jack bean (Canavalia ensifomias) and Lubia bean (Lablab Purpus) in some parts of west Nigeria. J Exp Agr Int. 2018; 21(4): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.9734/JEAI/2018/39835

Trabalho de Inquerito Agricola)/Inquerito Agrıcola Integrado(TIA/IAI). Rural household Income surveys. Directorate of Economics, Ministry of Agriculture; Maputo, Republic of Mozambique: 2012.

FAO, 2013. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available from http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx (Accessed on January 2024).

Esilaba AO, Nyongesa D, Okoti M, Otipa M, Wasilwa L. Pigeon Peas Extension Manual – (KCEP-CRAL), Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization; Nairobi, Kenya: April 2021.

Yimer Z, Yaregal W, Fikre A, Degefu T, Rao G. Large-plot-based performance evaluation of pigeon Pea (Cajanus Cajan L. Millsp.) varieties for grain yield and agronomic traits under irrigation conditions in Mandura District, North-West, Ethiopia. Int J Res Agron. 2020; 3(1): 08-12

Ghosh BK. Changing scenario of crop diversification in Nepal: delineating the role of trade openness, urbanization and rural infrastructure. J Tekirdag Agr Faculty. 2021; 18(4): 599-612. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.746464

Emefiene ME, Joshua VI, Nwadike C, Yaroson AY, Zwalnan NDE. Profitability analysis of pigeon pea (Cajanus Cajan) production in riyom lga of plateau state. Acad J Interdiscip Stud. 2014; 3(7): 44-54. 10.5901/ajis.2014.v3n7p44

Siya R. Choudhary VK. An economic analysis production and marketing of pigeon pea in surguj district of Chhattisgarh. Pharma Innov J. 2022; 11(4): 1123-7.

Waldman KB, Ortega DL, Richardson RB, Snapp SS. Estimating Demand for Perennial Pigeon pea in Malawi using choice experiments. Ecol Econ. 2017; 131: 222-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.006

Angadi S, Patil BL. Economics of cost of cultivation of green gram in gadag district of Karnataka. J Pharmacog Phytochem. 2018; 7(3): 1206-10.

Hanumanthappa D, Vasudevan SN, Shakuntala NM, Muniswamy NM, Maacha SI, Hiremath U. Evaluation of pigeonpea genotypes for growth and yield characters. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020; 9(4): 2625-37. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.904.314

Simion T, Ersulo D, Fikire A. Performance evaluation of pigeon pea (Cajanus Cajan L. Millsp.) variety for registration in the lowland areas of Ethiopia. Adv Agr. 2022; 2022: Article ID 7013602. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7013602

NMSDHB (National Meteorological Service Directorate, Hawassa Branch). Summary of Rainfall Records of Karat Zuria and Boreda Districts: 2013-2022 E.C. Hawassa, Ethiopia, 2023 (unpublished).

KZOA (Konso Zone Office of Agriculture). Annual Report 2023 (Unpublished).

Ingram J, Chiswella H, Mills J, Debruyne L, Cooreman H, Koutsouris A, et al. Enabling learning in demonstration farms: A literature review. Int J Agr Ext .2018; 6(3): 29-42.

Rajashekhar M, Reddy TP, Keerthi MC, Rajashekar B, Reddy MJR, Ramakrishna K, et al. Evaluation of integrated pest management module for pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) and its economic analysis under farmer’s field conditions. Int J Pest Manag. 2022; 68(3): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2022.2096269

CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center). Second Semiannual Progress Report for the QPM Development Project for the Horn and East Africa. July 1- December 31, 2004.

Sushan C, Shampa GR, Imdadul MH, Majharul I, Nabi KME. Yield and profitability analysis of pulse and oil seed based cropping patterns against aman- boro- fallow cropping systems in magura. Agr Sci Digest. 2021; 41(1): 42-8. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.D-261

CSA. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Central Statistical Agency Agricultural Sample Survey 2021/2022: Report on Area and Production of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season), Volume I. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Kebede B, Korji D, Amare G, Dabalo B. On farm demonstration and evaluation of improved chickpea varieties at Adola Rede, Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Innov Technol Agr. 2018; 2: 531-7.

Asredie S, De Jong W, Perry K, Halseth D, Mengistu F. Participatory variety selection: a tool to understand farmers′ potato variety selection criteria. Open Agr. 2017; 2(1): 453-63. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2017-0049

Makosa D. Integrating consumer preferences into breeding: a stepping stone to food security. Department of Agricultural Economics, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Japan; Presented on Wheat for Food Security in Africa, October 8-12, 2012. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Majili ZS, Nyaruhucha C, Kulwa K, Mutabazi K, Rybak C, Sieber S. Preferences and consumption of pigeon peas among rural households as determinants for developing diversified products for sustainable health. Sustainability. 2020; 12(15): 6130. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156130

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Lakamo L. Lemma, Abebaw B. Wada, Melese E. Bune