Keywords
Habitat variables
Breeding density
Silver lime forests
Confirmed breeding
How to Cite
Abstract
The breeding density of the Woodpigeon was determined in square LH75 in the period from March to May 2023. For this purpose, a point counting method was used, and in addition, some characteristics of the habitats were taken into account. The breeding density of Woodpigeon in the present study was 16.42, 12.75 and 14.44 pairs/100ha, in March, April and May 2023 year, respectively. Breeding density decreases from March to May. Anova analysis showed statistically significant differences in the mean number of song pigeons by habitat and cropland types (F=8.11, p=0.005). The number of song Woodpigeons was significantly greater in open habitats with single large trees or small groups of large trees among grassland and meadows than in other breeding habitat types. Their number is relatively high in Silver lime forests, coniferous plantations, and in the fringe strip of all forest habitats. The number of song pigeons is also relatively high in cases where we have a lack of arable land in the fixed radius or in the presence of wheat. Their number in the fixed radius increased with increasing average tree height. The number of singing pigeons is positively correlated with tree height (R=0.49, F=2.132, p<0.0001). The latest data on the breeding density of the Woodpigeon are from the end of the last century in Bulgaria. This study presents first results on the breeding distribution and density of the species in an information-poor area.
References
Hagemeijer EJM, Blair MJ. The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: their distribution and abundance. London: T & A.D. Poyser; 1997, pp. 903.
Tucker GM, Heath MF. Birds in Europe: Their Conservation Status. The Auk 1997; 114(2): 310–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089181
Heath M, Borggreve C, Peet N. European Bird Populations: Estimates and Trends. Birdlife Conservation Series No. 10. Cambridge: BirdLife International; 2000, p. 160.
Taleb M, Fennane M. Morocco. In: Radford EA, Catullo G, de Montmollin B, Eds. Important Plant Areas of the South and East Mediterranean Region: Priority Sites for Conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Málaga, Spain; 2011, pp. 22-6.
Merabet A, Bensitouaha N, Baghdouda A, Doumandji S. Reproduction du Pigeon ramier Columba palumbus Linné, 1758 en milieu suburbain dans la partie orientale de la Mitidja (Algérie). Nat Technol. 2011; 5: 92-8.
Saari L. Woodpigeon. In: Hagemeijer WJM, Blair MJ, Eds. The EBCC Atlas of European breeding birds: their distribution and abundance. London: T & A.D. Poyser; 1997, pp. 384-5.
Luniak M. Synurbization – adaptation of animal wildlife to urban development. In: Shaw WW, Harris KL, Druff L, Eds. Proceedings 4th International Urban Wildlife Symposium. Tucson, Arizona: 2004, pp. 50-5.
Witt K, Mitschke A, Luniak M. A comparison of common breeding bird populations in Hamburg, Berlin and Warsaw. Acta Ornithologica. 2005; 40: 139-46. https://doi.org/10.3161/068.040.0209
Malovichko L, Yufereva V, Tel’pov V, Yuferev D. The distribution and dynamics of synanthropisation of the common wood pigeon in the Stravropol region. South Russ: Ecol Dev. 2021; 16(3): 33-46. https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2021-3-33-46
Csanady A. Synurbanization of the Common Wood Pigeon, Columba palumbus Linnaeus, 1758 in Prešov city (Slovakia). Acta Musei Silesiae, Scientiae Naturales. 2023; 72: 18-23. https://doi.org/10.2478/cszma-2023-0002
Patev P. Birds in Bulgaria. Sofia: BAS, Marin Drinov Academic Publishers; 1950; p. 364.
Simeonov S, Mitchev T, Nankinov D. Fauna of Bulgaria. Vol. 20. Aves, Part I. Sofia, Bulgaria: Marin Drinov Academic Publishers; 1990.
Nankinov D. Birds of Sofia. Ornithol Bull. 1982; 12: 1-386.
Hristov I, Popgeorgiev G, Spasov S, Petkov N, Plachijski D, Stoychev S. The state of Bulgarias’ common birds 2023. Bulgarian Society of the Protection of Birds (BSPB); 2023. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15475.09762
Lehrer A, Delchev Ch. Modern methods for biogeographical mapping of Bulgaria. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica. 1978; 10: 3-12.
Iankov P. Atlas of Breeding Birds in Bulgaria. Conservation Series, Book 10. Sofia: Bulgarian Society of the Protection of Birds (BSPB); 2007.
Popgeorgiev G, Spasov S, Kornilev V. SmartBirds – Information system with biological information. Available from: http://www.smartbirds.org (Accessed on: 2024-9-15).
Bondev I. The vegetation of Bulgaria. Map M 1:600 000 with explanatory text. Sofia: Sofia University Press; 1991.
Bibby C, Burgess N, Hill D, Mustoe H. Bird Census Techniques, 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2000.
Sutherland WJ. Ecological Census Techniques, a handbook. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
Wolf A, Howe R, Gregory D. Detectability of forest birds from stationary points in Northern Wisconsin. In: Ralph J, Sauer J, Droege S, Eds. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-149. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: 1995, pp. 19-24.
Lynch F. Effects of point count duration, time of day, and aural stimuli on detectability of migratory and resident bird species in Quintana Roo, Mexico. In: Ralph J, Sauer J, Droege S, Eds. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-149. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: 1995, pp. 1-6p.
Digby A, Towsey M, Bell B, Teal P. A practicl comparison of manual and autonomous methods for acoustic monitoring. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013; 4(7): 675-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12060
Ralph C, Sauer J, Droege S. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-149. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: 1995. https://doi.org/10.2737/PSW-GTR-149
StatSoft, Inc. STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System), Version 10. 2011; http://www.statsoft.com
Mitev I, Ferdinandova I. Woodpigeon, Columba palumbus. In: Iankov P, Ed. Atlas of Breeding Birds in Bulgaria. Conservation Series, Book 10. Sofia: Bulgarian Society of the Protection of Birds; 2007, PP. 306-7.
Kopij G. Comparison of population densities of selected bird species breeding in main urban habitats in southwestern Poland. Biologia. 2020; 66(3): 145-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.6001/biologija.v66i3.4309
Bendjoudi D, Voisin J.-F, Doumandji S, Merabet A, Benyounes N, Chenchouni H. Rapid increase in number and change of land-use in two expanding Columbidae species (Columba palumbus and Streptopelia decaocto) in Algeria. Avian Res. 2015; 6: 18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40657-015-0027-9
Sakhvon V, Kövèr L. Distribution and habitat preferences of the urban Woodpigeon (Columba palumbus) in the north-eastern breeding range in Belarus. Landsc Urban Plan. 2020; 201: 103846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103846
Simeonov S. Ornithological Study of Pirin Mountain (PhD thesis). Sofia University; 1971.
Slater P. Breeding ecology of a suburban population of Woodpigeons Columba palumbus in northwest England. Bird Study. 2001; 48: 361-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00063650109461235
Inglis IR, Thearle RJ, Isaacson AJ. Woodpigeon (Columba palumbus) damage to oilseed rape. Crop Prot. 1989; 8(5): 299-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(89)90048-3
Inglis IR, Isaacson AJ, Smith GC, Haynes PJ, Thearle RJ. The effect on the woodpigeon (Columba palumbus) of the introduction of oilseed rape into Britain. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 1997; 61(2): 2-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(96)01107-3
O’Huallachain D. Nest site location and success rates of an urban population of Woodpigeon Columba palumbus in Ireland. Biol Environ: Proc Royal Irish Acad. 2014; 114B(1): pp. 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/bae.2014.0014
Aghanajafi S, Bakhshipour R. Modeling of Wood Pigeon (Columba palumbus) nesting selection in Yazd Baghshadi protected area with the use of binomial logistic regression. J Animal Environ. 2018; 10(1): 67-72.
Murton R.K. The breeding of Woodpigeon populations. Bird Study 1958; 5: 157–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00063655809475918
Bengtsson K. Which Wood Pigeon Columba palumbus clutches generate young? Ornis Svecica. 2001; 11: 99-101. https://doi.org/10.34080/os.v11.22866
Tomiałojć L. Changes in breeding bird communities of two urban parks in Wroclaw across 40 years (1970-2010): Before and after colonization by important predators. Ornis Polonica. 2011; 52: 1-25.
Floigl K, Benedetti Y, Reif J, Morelli F. Spatial distribution overlap of five Columbidae species in the Czech Republic. Animals 2022; 12(6): 743. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12060743
Gruychev G. New breeding localities of Stock Pigeon (Columba oenas Linnaeus, 1758) in Bulgaria: Do game feeding grounds contribute to increasing distribution of the species? Glob J Agric Innov Res Dev. 2023; 10: 102-7. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9813.2023.10.6
BirdLife International. Columba palumbus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2018; e.T22690103A131924602. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T22690103A131924602.en (Accessed on 10 September 2024).
Burns F, Eaton M, Burfield I, Klvanova A, Silarova E, Staneva A, et al. Abundance decline in the avifauna of the European Union reveals cross-continental similarities in biodiversity change. Ecol Evol. 2021; 11: 16647-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8282
Burfield I, Rutherford C, Fernando E, Grice H, Piggott A, Martin R, et al. Birds in Europe 4: the fourth assessment of species of European Conservation Concern. Bird Conserv Int. 2023; 33: e66, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270923000187
Evans K, Hatchwell B, Parnell M, Gaston K. A conceptual framework for the colonization of urban areas: The blackbird Turdus merula as a case study. Biol Rev. 2010; 85: 643-67. doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00121.x
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Tsvetomira R. Todorova, Gradimir V. Gruychev