Keywords
Influencing Factors
Hierarchical Structure Model
Mine Geological Environment
Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
How to Cite
Abstract
The study of mine geological environmental quality evaluation methods has always been an important topic. Taking the mining geological environment of Muping District, Shandong Province as the research background, and based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, a hierarchical structure model of the quality evaluation index of the mine geological environment in the study area was established, the relative importance of the 14 rating levels was estimated, and the weights were calculated. And sorting, establish a mine geological environment quality evaluation index system; then, according to the calculated comprehensive threshold value, establish a comprehensive evaluation grade of the mine geological environment. The results of the study show that the degree of environmental pollution (air, soil, water), vegetation coverage, topography and landform are the main factors for the evaluation of the geological environmental quality of the mines in the study area, and their weights are 0.3114, 0.1743, and 0.1184 in order. According to the principle of the maximum degree of membership, the mine geological environment quality is determined to be a good grade. Through the verification of the survey results of the mine geological environment on-site, the results show that the weights calculated by this method are reasonable, and the theoretical analysis and evaluation results obtained are in good agreement with reality. This method is worthy of popularization in the mine environment assessment work. Decision-making and governance provide decision-making support services.
References
ZHAO Y L. Study and application of analytic hierarchy process of mine geological environment: A case study in Hainan Island. RemoteSensing for Land & Resources, 2020, 32(01): 148-153.
ZHU G Y, XIONG W. Comparison research on application of the fussy assessment method's and comprehensive index method's in thepost ecology assessment. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2011, 42(02): 54-59.
ZHAO X L, QI Q J, ZHAO G Z, et al. Establishment and application of set pair analysis model for a three-dimensional quantitativeevaluation of coal mining environment. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2014, 28(11): 72-77.
LUO D J, WU S K, GUO K. The Comprehensive Evaluation of Exploitation and Utilization Efficiency of Mineral Resources Based onCombination Weight and Gray Relation Analysis Method. Metal Mine, 2015(02): 20-25.
WANG H M. The study on eco-environmental evaluation model of coal mine based on analytic hierarchy process method. ChinaMining Magazine, 2020, 29(07): 70-75.
WENG Y J, TANG D S, WANG Y Y. Effect Post-evaluation of Water Conservancy Project of Reinforcement and Reconstruction Based on FAHP Method. Water Resources and Power, 2009, 27(05): 145-148.
YU D J, XU Z S, YAN Z P. Knowledge diffusion and theme evolution analysis in the analytic hierarchy process
[J/OL]. Journal of Universityof Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition): 1-8
-06-18].
PEI S J, SU Y. Research on the Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process in University Teaching Evaluation System. Light IndustryScience and Technology, 2021, 37(04): 167-169.
ZHEN Y A, XIA Z H, LUO Y, et al. Research on Operation and Maintenance Mode of Photovoltaic Poverty Alleviation Power Station Basedon Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Electric Power, 2021, 54(06): 191-198.
BAI F, YANG N, CHANG P, et al. Experimental calibration of risk weight coefficient of Tibetan masonry based on fuzzy analytic hierarchymethod [J/OL]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering: 1-8 [2021-06-18].
MA Y, ZHAO J N, LIAO S L. Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to mineral prospectivity mapping of polymetallic sulfidedeposits in the Southwest Indian ridge between 46° to 52° E. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(6):7 5-82.
ZHOU S H, XING J K, ZHANG Y Q, et al. An assessment model based on the hierarchical fuzzy analysis process for the bedding slope withthe prestressed anchor cable frame reinforcement. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2020, 20(05): 1695-1704.
LI X, Xiao G R, CAI S Z. Evaluation of water environmental sensitivity based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process combined with webtext. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2019,21(12):1832-1844.
XU Y N. Investigation and research on the mine geological environment: present status and outlook. Geological Bulletin of China,2008(08): 1235-1244.
WU W S, LI X Y. Exploitation of mineral resources and restoration of ecology. China Mining Magazine, 2021, 30(02): 21-24.
LI Z Y, ZHANG J L, LUO M L, et al. Subregional evaluation of the current state of mine geological environment in Zigong city. ChinaMining Magazine, 2021, 30(02): 73-79.
LI J, HAO Y H, SUN J M, et al. Evaluation of Ecological Environment' Spatio-Temporal Variation In Urban Mine Based on Rsei. UrbanDevelopment Studies, 2021, 28(01): 17-22.
TANG Z P, SUN J P, LIU H, et al. Risk assessment of high-speed railway lines based on improved fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. ChinaScience paper, 2016, 11(19): 2243-2247.
HAO C S, SHENG J K, FAN X M, et al. Evaluation Model of Coal Safety Based on Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process. Coal Technology,2016, 35(02): 234-236.
GUO Q, ZHANG H, LIU H C. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Geological Environment in Baoding Mine Based on Fuzzy AnalyticHierarchy Process. Metal Mine, 2017(08): 193-198.
SONG X M, FAN B, SONG K X, et al. Evaluation of process modularization scheme based on the improved TFAHP and TOPSIS. ChinaScience paper, 2020, 15(04): 438-443+448.
CHEN L, WU C F, CHEN Z Y, et al. Study on the Reevaluation System of Non-coal Open-pit Mine Safety Standardization by AHP-FuzzyComprehensive. Mining Research and Development, 2016, 36(04): 99-103.
CHEN Z W, XU F M. Study on the Comprehensive Evaluation of Mine Ecological Environment Based on AHP and FUZZY. Bulletin ofScience and Technology, 2017, 33(12): 262-269.
CHEN Q, HU K, LUO K L, et al. Study on the Synthetical Assessment Model of Mine Eco-environments Based on A HP. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2006(03): 377-383.
JIA H, LIU J S, YIN X Y, et al. Study on mine geological environment evaluation of Tongling pyrite concentrated mining area in Anhui Province [J/OL]. Earth Science Frontiers: 1-13 [2021-06-19].
YAN Z G, LIU Y P, WANG X L. Evaluation criterion and method of green mine. China Coal, 2012, 38(02): 116-120.
DING R J, LIU N. Study of Coal Mine Sustainable Development Based on AHP Method. Coal Technology, 2014, 33(09): 331-333.
LUO Z Q, YANG S L. Comparative Study on Several Scales in AHP. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2004(09): 51-60.
REN Y L. Evaluation system for interactive asset performance management based on 1-9 scaling method. Experimental Technology and Management, 2017, 34(11): 259-262.
ZHU Y, MENG Z Y, KAN S Y. Determination of Weight Value by AHP. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 1999(05): 119-122.
MA L, DING X H, LI K M, et al. Research and application of comprehensive evaluation model of surface coal mine based on fuzzy theory. China Science paper, 2016, 11(21): 2422-2427.
WANG S W, LI X J, DAI F R, et al. Risk Assessment of Gas Explosion Based on improved AHP-SPA. Mining Research and Development, 2021, 41(04): 113-117.
DENG X, LI J M, ZENG H J, et al. Research on Computation Methods of AHP Wight Vector and Its Applications. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2012, 42(07): 93-100.
SUN B, XIAO R C. Bridge Fire Risk Assessment System Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2015, 43(11): 1619-1625.
DU S P, WANG J,MA W B. Application of AHP and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method in the Environment Quality Evaluation of University Campus. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2008(10): 3930-3931+3942.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.