Keywords
Optimal reverberation for masjids
Quality of the acoustic environment
Optimal reverberation for Muslim worshippers
How to Cite
Abstract
This study investigates the optimal reverberation time in masjids (mosques) from worshippers' viewpoint for the two modes of performance: recitation and sermon/speech. It also examines the effect of both age and gender on worshippers' preferences. To this end, specially convolved five audio clips (five acoustic setups) for each mode were created and uploaded to Google Drive. More than 300, Arabic-speaking participants, males, and females of different ages, listened to these clips. The participants judged the quality (Q, or appropriateness) of these audio clips for listening either to the recitation (QR) or speech (QS) on a unipolar discrete five-grade scale via a questionnaire that was created on Google Forms. Results indicated that both QR and QS are functions of gender and age. Overall, younger worshippers preferred higher reverberation and vice versa, while gender significantly affected the perception of the desirable reverberation for both recitation and speech. Females tended to the shorter reverberant environment (1.38 s for recitation mode, 0.75 s for speech mode, in the mid-frequency range) than males who preferred longer reverberation for recitation in particular (1.77 s).
References
Skålevik M. Reverberation time - the mother of all room acoustical parameters. In: Baltic-Nordic Acoustic Meeting BNAM 2010, Bergen, Norway; 10-12 May, 2010.
Kaplanis N, Bech S, Jensen S H, Waterschoot T. Perception of Reverberation in Small Rooms: A Literature Study. In: Audio Engineering Society AES 55TH International Conference, Helsinki, Finland; 27-29 August, 2014.
Nowoświat A, Olechowska M, Marchacz M. The effect of acoustical remedies changing the reverberation time for different frequencies in a dome used for worship: A case study. Appl Acoust 2020;160: 107-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107143
Álvarez-Morales L, Girón S, Galindo M, Zamarreño T. Acoustic environment of Andalusian cathedrals. Build Environ 2016; 103:182-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.011
Ismail MR, Eldaly H. Acoustic of monolithic dome structures. Front. Archit. Res 2018; 7: 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2017.11.002
BRITISH STANDARD, (BS EN ISO 3382-1:2009), Acoustics - Measurement of room acoustic parameters, Part 1: Performance spaces.
BRITISH STANDARD, (ISO 3382-2:2008), Acoustics - Measurement of room acoustic parameters, Part 2: Reverberation time in ordinary rooms.
Javed HA, Cauchi B, Doclo S, Naylor PA, Goetze S. Measuring, modelling and predicting perceived reverberation. In: The 42nd IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2017), New Orleans, LA, USA; 5-9 March, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2017.7952182
Engel I, Henry C, Garí A, Robinson PW, Poirier-Quinot D, Picinali L. Perceptual comparison of Ambisonics-based reverberation methods in binaural listening. In: EAA Spatial Audio Signal Processing Symposium, Paris, France; Sept. 6-7, 2019.
Reinhart PN, Souza PE. Effects of Varying Reverberation on Music Perception for Young Normal-Hearing and Old Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Trends in Hearing 2018; 22:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216517750706
Frissen I, Katz BFG, Guastavino C. Effect of Sound Source Stimuli on the Perception of Reverberation in Large Volumes. In: Auditory Display, The 6th International Symposium-CMMR/ICAD; 18-22 May, 2009.
Lavandiera M, Culling JF. Speech segregation in rooms: Monaural, binaural, and interacting effects of reverberation on target and interferer. J Acoust Soc Am (JASA) 2008; 123(4): 2237-2248. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2871943
Berardi U. A Double Synthetic Index to Evaluate the Acoustics of Churches. Arch. Acoust. 2012; 37(4): 521-528. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10168-012-0050-3
Tsilfidis A, Papadakos C, Kokkinis E, Chryssochoidis G, Delviniotis D, Kouroupetroglou G, Mourjopoulos J. Reverberation and Dereverberation Effect on Byzantine Chants. In: The 135th Convention, New York, USA; 17-20 October, 2013.
Girón S, Galindo M, Gómez-Gómez T. Assessment of the subjective perception of reverberation in Spanish cathedrals. Build Environ 2020;171: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106656
Hoeg W, Christensen L, Walker R. Subjective assessment of audio quality - the means and methods within the EBU. EBU Technical Review 1997; 40-50.
Theo Goverts S, Steven Colburn H. Binaural Recordings in Natural Acoustic Environments: Estimates of Speech-Likeness and Interaural Parameters. Trends in Hearing 2020; 24:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216520972858
Karabiber Z. Acoustical Problems in Mosques. In: ASA/EAA/DAGA Meeting, Berlin, Germany; 15-19 March 1999.
Abdou AA. Measurement of acoustical characteristics of mosques in Saudi Arabia. J Acoust Soc Am (JASA) 2003, 113(3): 1505-17. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1531982
ElKhateeb A, Ismail MR. Sounds from the Past the Acoustics of Sultan Hassan Mosque and Madrasa. Build Acoust 2007; 14(2): 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1260/135101007781448037
Elkhateeb A, Adas A, Attia M, Balila Y. The acoustics of masjids, why they differ from the classical speech rooms. In: The 22nd International Congress on Sound and Vibration ICSV 22, Florence, Italy; 12-16 July 2015.
Elkhateeb A, Eldakdoky S. The acoustics of Mamluk masjids: A case study of Iwan-type masjids in Cairo. Appl Acoust 2021; 178:1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.107988
Hammad R.N.S. Rasti measurements in mosques in Amman, Jordan. Appl Acoust 1990; 30( 4): 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-682X(90)90082-6
Karabiber Z, Erdogan S. Comparison of the Acoustical Properties of an Ancient and a Recent Mosque. In: Forum Acusticum, Sevilla, Spain; 2002.
Seogijanto R, Henriza R. The effect of ceiling shape on the acoustics of Indonesian mosques. In: Forum Acusticum: 3rd European Congress on Acoustics, Sevilla, Spain; 16-20 September 2002.
Prodi N, Marsilo M. On the Effect of Domed Ceiling in Worship Spaces: A Scale Model Study of a Mosque. Build. Acoust 2003; 10(2): 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1260/135101003768965979
Kayili M. Acoustic Solutions in Classic Ottoman Architecture. Foundation for science Technology and Civilization (FSTC); [Online.] available: ; May 2005.
António C, Monteiro C G. Comparison of The Acoustics of Mosques and Catholic Churches. In: The 6th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Kraków , Poland; 5-9 July 2009.
Al-Saleh K. How loud should the sound level be in the mosque?. In: Engineering Systems Management and Its Applications (ICESMA), 2010 2nd International Conference on, Sharjah; 30 March -April 1, 2010.
Othman AR, Mohamed MR. Influence of Proportion towards Speech Intelligibility in Mosque's Praying Hall. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2012; 35: 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.094
Elkhateeb A, Adas A, Attia M, Balila Y. Absorption characteristics of masjid carpets," Appl Acoust 2016; 105: 143-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.12.005
Hossameldien H, Alshawan AA. Sound Quality inside Mosques: A Case Study on the Impact of Mihrab Geometry. Intech Open Chapter, Indoor Environmental Quality. [Online.] available: ; 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.83486
Gül ZS. Acoustical Impact of Architectonics and Material Features in the Lifespan of Two Monumental Sacred Structures. Acoustics 2019; 1(3): 493-516. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics1030028
Sabbagh M, Elkhateeb A. Effect of body posture on sound absorption by human subjects. Appl Acoust 2021;183: 108317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108317
Elkhateeb A, Adas A, Attia M, Balila Y. Are our Masjids Suffering Excessive Reverberation!. In: The 23rd International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Athens, Greece; 10-14 July 2016.
Najmul Imam SM, Ahmed N, Takahashi D. An Optimum Reverberation Time for Mosques in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 2009; 44 (2): 163-170. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjsir.v44i2.3667
Elkhateeb A. What should the reverberation inside a masjid be? A study exploring the demands of Imams. In: Worship Sound Spaces, Architecture, Acoustics and Anthropology. Christine Guillebaud. Routledge; 2019. p. 77-103. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429279782-6
Najmul Imam SM. Optimization of Reverberation Time in Mosques for Bangla Speaking Community. 2017.
Al-Hilālī MT, Khān MM. Translation of the meanings of the Noble Qur'an into the English Language. King Fahd Glorious Qur'ān Printing Complex, al-Madīnah al-Munawwarah, 2016, Chapter 73, verse 4.
Nelson K. The Art of Reciting the Qur'an. The American University in Cairo Press, pp. xiv-xvi, 3, 101-104, 113, 153-154, 190-191; 2001.
Cremer L, Muller HA. Principles and Applications of Room Acoustics. Applied Science Publishers LTD, 1(0); 1982, pp. 509.
Wilson A. Rate of Syllable Production in Selected Languages. Master of Science in Communication Sciences and Disorders, Missouri State University; 2009.
Mosque of Ibn Tulun. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Online]. Available: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosque_of_Ibn_Tulun>21 August 2019. [Accessed 16 July 2021].
Fatimid architecture. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Online]. Available: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatimid_architecture> 25 November 2018. [Accessed 16 July 2021].
Elkhateeb A, Soliman S. The Numerical Description of the Historical Masjids in Cairo. Ain Shams Journal of Architectural Engineering (ASJAE) 2009; 2: 65-87.
Langmead D, Garnaut C. Encyclopedia of Architectural and Engineering Feats. ABC-Clio, 322-23;2001.
Karabiber Z. A New Approach to an Ancient Subject: CAHRISMA Project. In: the 7th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Garmisch-Parterkirchen, Germany; 4-7 July 2000.
Ottoman architecture. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Online]. Available: < https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_architecture >; 27 March 2021. [Accessed 17 July 2021].
The Aga Khan Trust for Culture (AKTC), an agency of the Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN). Archnet [Online]. Available:< https://archnet.org/>. [Accessed 16 July 2021].
Sinan, Ottoman architect. Britannica [Online]. Available: <https://www.britannica.com/biography/Sinan>13 July 2021. [Accessed 17 July 2021].
Mimar Sinan. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Online]. Available:<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mimar_Sinan>; 26 April 2020. [Accessed 17 July 2021].
Saoud R. Sinan: A Great Ottoman Architect and Urban Designer. Foundation for science Technology and Civilization, June 2007.
Dart T. The interpretation of music. New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1; 1963, pp. 57-58.
Harris CM, Knudsen VO. Acoustical Designing in Architecture. Acoustical Society of Amer, 1980
Elkhateeb A, Adas A, Attia M, Balila Y. The Acoustics of Masjids, Looking for Future Design Criteria. In: The 23rd International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Athens, Greece; 10-14 July, 2016.
Fausti P, Pompoli R, Prodi N. Comparing the Acoustics of Mosques and Byzantine Churches. In: CIPA XIXth International Symposium, Antalya, Turkey; 30 September-04 October, 2003.
Bech S, Zacharov N. Perceptual Audio Evaluation-Theory, Method and Application. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2006, pp. xiv, 3, 39-41, 65-67, 301-303.
BRITISH STANDARD, (BS.1284-2-Recommendation ITU-R) General methods for the subjective assessment of sound quality, Broadcasting service (sound), 01/2019.
Lund A. Ordinal Regression- laerd Statistics- [Online]. Available: <https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/ordinal-regression-using-spss-statistics.php>. [Accessed 25 July 2021].
Ahmed AR. Islamic architecture in Egypt from the Arab conquest until the end of the Mamluk era, 21-923 AH/641-1517 AD (in Arabic). Dar Alfiker Alarabi, (1); 2009, p. 223.
Ashour S. The Mamluk Era in Egypt and the Levant (in Arabic). Dar Alnahda Alarabiya, (2); 1976, p. (H).
Ottoman art, Britannica [Online]. Available: <https://www.britannica.com/topic/Islamic-arts/Ottoman-art>. [Accessed 22 November 2021].
Walter T, Alison G, Stein B, Reynolds J. In: Mechanical and electrical equipment for buildings. John Wiley and Sons Inc; 2006. p. 772-774.
Templeton D, Saunders D, Mapp P, Sacre P. Acoustics in the Built Environment: Advice for the Design Team., D. Templeton, Architectural Press, 2;1998, p. 58.
Yilmazer S, Acun V. A grounded theory approach to assess indoor soundscape in historic religious spaces of Anatolian culture: A case study on Hacı Bayram Mosque. Build Acoust 2018; 25(2): 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X18763915
Don M, Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Masuda A. Gender differences in cochlear response time: an explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brain-stem response. J Acoust Soc Am (JASA) 1993; 94 (4): 2135-48. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.407485
Vocal cords. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Online]. Available < https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vocal_cords>; July, 2021. [Accessed November 2021].
Simpson AP. Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal tract dimensions. J Acoust Soc Am (JASA) 2001; 109(5): 2153-64. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1356020
Costandi M. 50 Human Brain Ideas You Really Need to Know, Quercus; UK ed., 2013.
Brinkmann F, Aspöck L, Ackermann D, Lepa S, Vorländer M, Weinzierl S. A round robin on room acoustical simulation and auralization. J Acoust Soc Am (JASA) 2019; 145(4): 2746-2760. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5096178
South Asia. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Online]. Available: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Asia>; May 2021. [Accessed 11 July 2021].
Tamil language. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Online]. Available: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_language>; 2005. [Accessed 11 July 2021].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmed Elkhateeb, Soha Eldakdoky