Innovative Methodological Instrument for Quantification of Professional Risk Specific to Complex Systems of Work
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2014), Articles
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2014)

Innovative Methodological Instrument for Quantification of Professional Risk Specific to Complex Systems of Work

Articles
https://doi.org/10.15377/2410-3624.2014.01.01.2
Published 2014-11-27
Gabriel Vasilescu
National Institute for Research and Development in Mine Safety and Protection to Explosion–Insemex Petroşani, 32-34 G-ral Vasile Milea STR, 332047 Petroşani, Hunedoara, Romania
Mihail Vătăsescu
Polytechnic University of Timisoara, Revolutiei Street no.5, 331128, Hunedoara County, Romania
Passca Mihaela
Polytechnic University of Timisoara, Revolutiei Street no.5, 331128, Hunedoara County, Romania
Ciprian Jitea
National Institute for Research and Development in Mine Safety and Protection to Explosion–Insemex Petroşani, 32-34 G-ral Vasile Milea STR, 332047 Petroşani, Hunedoara, Romania
PDF

Keywords

Methodology
workplace
risk factor
assessment.

How to Cite

1.
Gabriel Vasilescu, Mihail Vătăsescu, Passca Mihaela, Ciprian Jitea. Innovative Methodological Instrument for Quantification of Professional Risk Specific to Complex Systems of Work. Glob. Environ. Eng. [Internet]. 2014 Nov. 27 [cited 2024 Dec. 23];1(1):11-23. Available from: https://avantipublisher.com/index.php/tgevnie/article/view/130
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This paper presents research on estimating and assessing occupational risks to secure specific activities in the presence of hazards of industrial work systems, and is based on a thorough knowledge of interdisciplinary concepts from various fields related to systems security engineering.
https://doi.org/10.15377/2410-3624.2014.01.01.2
PDF

References

Dragos Vasilescu Non-conventional methods for analysis and evaluation of occupational risks, INSEMEX Publishing House. Petroşani ISBN 978-973-88590-0-5, 2008.

Dragos Vasilescu Probabilistic calculation methods used to diagnose and prognose industrial risk, INSEMEX Publishing House 2008. Petroşani ISBN 978-973-88753-2-6, 2008.

Desroches A. Concepts et methodes probabilistes de base de la securite. Lavoisier-TEC&DOC 1995 Paris.

Murè, Demichela, Piccinini. Assessment of the risk of occupational accidents using a "fuzzy" approach, Cognition, Technology and Work 2006; 8: 103-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0025-5

Marhavilas, Koulouriotis. A risk-estimation methodological framework using quantitative assessment techniques and real accidents' data: Application in an aluminum extrusion industry, Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 2008; 21: 596-603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2008.04.009

Papadopoulos, Georgiadou, Papazoglou. Occupational and public health and safety in a changing work environment. An integrated approach for risk assessment and prevention Safety science 2010, 48, 943-949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.11.002

Conte, Rubio, Garcia. Occupational accidents model based on risk-injury affinity groups. Safety science 2011; 49: 306- 314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.005

Martini, Fantini, D'ovidio. Risk assessment of aggression toward emergency health care workers. Occupational medicine (Oxford) 2012; 62: 223-225.

Lee, Kim, Park. Construction Risk Assessment Using Site Influence Factors. Journal of computing in civil engineering 2012; 26: 319-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000146

Von Misses R. The Mathematical Theory of Prob and Statistics. Academic Press New York 1964.

Reichenbach H. Wahrscheinlickheitslehre. Leiden 1935.

Kolmogorov A. The Foundations of the Calculus of Probability. New York 1950.

All the published articles are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.